rgautier - fireatwill |
1-0, 4/6/2011. |
[3...Nc6
+0.22]
4.O-O
a6
5.c3
Qe7
6.b4
Be6
7.Bxe6
Qxe6
8.Bb2
Nf6
9.Re1
Be7
10.d4
exd4
11.Nxd4
Qg4
12.Qxg4
Nxg4
13.Nd2
O-O
14.Nf5
Bf6
15.Rab1
Ne5
16.c4
Kh7
17.c5
Nd3?
+1.75
[17...dxc5
18.bxc5
+0.41]
18.Bxf6
Nxe1
19.Bxg7
Nf3?
+3.75
[19...Rg8
20.Rxe1
+1.75]
20.Nxf3
Rg8
21.Bxh6
Rg6
22.Bf4
Rg4
23.g3
Nc6
24.cxd6
cxd6
25.Nxd6
Rg6
26.Nxf7
Rf8
27.N7e5
Rd6
28.Ng5
Kg7
29.Nxc6
Rxc6
30.Be5
Kg6
31.Nh3
Re6
32.Nf4
Kg5
33.Nxe6
[1-0] I really liked playing this game. It got interesting at move 18 where I gave up a rook for a bishop and (what I thought would be two pawns). I don't often play games where piece trades are uneven - most trades are either hung pieces or one-for-one trades of Knight for Bishop or vice versa, pawn for pawn, etc. In this case, my opponent failed to use all of his pieces during the game, leaving his Queen's rook locked away until late in the game, and this slow development cost him. As usual, the game is an amateur game (I'm a D-level player, for sure) so I'm sure you'll have plenty to pick at. Annotations are from a blunder check by Rybka 3.
No comments:
Post a Comment